|
|
|
<br>Objective: To compare play behaviors, interface cues, and social dynamics across three rummy contexts—traditional table play, the Aviato platform, and the OK [Rummy](https://ihip.mohfw.gov.in/npcchh/public/data/) platform—using unobtrusive observation. Rummy’s core mechanic—forming sets and runs while minimizing deadwood—was held constant, while platform-specific features were treated as environmental variables that might scaffold or reshape decision-making. |